We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR." The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. "Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future" I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance. Consequently, Nietzsche’s view allows for the possibility of a positively defined concept of the social good in which morality is the affirmation and enhancement of every subject’s happiness, and justice can be achieved through the promotion and protection of an equality of power among subjects."Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. The Nietzschean subject desires to manifest power in the form of activity that is independent of external agents, not to dominate the other. Consequently, Freud’s view allows only for a negative conception of the social good in which morality is defined as the intrinsically impossible task of eliminating evil, and justice can be achieved only through the equal distribution of instinctual frustration.įinally, I argue that in Nietzsche’s theory of desire there is no essential conflict between individual desire and social life.
I argue that the Freudian subject seeks to dominate the social other, and that there is an insurmountable conflict between the satisfaction of desire and the demands of social life. Next, I explicate the stakes of this opposition by analyzing the social consequences of each view for morality and justice. I argue that Nietzsche’s view of desire is fundamentally opposed to the key elements of Freud’s theory of desire: the principle of constancy, the Freudian definition of the drive, and the pleasure principle. I then analyze Nietzsche’s attempt to ground his theory of desire in the concept of the will to power. Consequently, Freud’s theory of desire can only be interpreted consistently as a monism of the death drive. Furthermore, the principle of inertia is not essentially distinct from his later theory of the death drive.
I first argue that Freud’s theory of desire is grounded in the principle of inertia, a principle that is incompatible with his later theory of Eros and the life drive. However, this essay argues that on the subject of desire their work presents us with a radical choice: Freud or Nietzsche. Many commentators have remarked upon the striking points of correspondence that can be found in the works of Freud and Nietzsche.
0 kommentar(er)
